<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Who is Our Lady of Guadalupe?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.bustedhalo.com/questionbox/who-is-our-lady-of-guadalupe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/questionbox/who-is-our-lady-of-guadalupe/</link> <description>an online magazine for spiritual seekers.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:32:17 -0400</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Steve</title><link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/questionbox/who-is-our-lady-of-guadalupe/#comment-7163</link> <dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:14:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/beta2008/wp/?p=565#comment-7163</guid> <description>Also, Henry, the tilma itself is 500 years old, yet has not decayed.  Tilma&#039;s are cloaks made from cacti, I believe.  If it were of earthly hands, should have disintegrated half a millennium ago....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Henry, the tilma itself is 500 years old, yet has not decayed.  Tilma&#8217;s are cloaks made from cacti, I believe.  If it were of earthly hands, should have disintegrated half a millennium ago&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Henry</title><link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/questionbox/who-is-our-lady-of-guadalupe/#comment-5054</link> <dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:13:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/beta2008/wp/?p=565#comment-5054</guid> <description>I just want to clarify that scientific analysis has demonstrated that the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe is NOT a painting if you are defining a painting as: &quot;The representing of a subject on a surface by the application of paint or colors&quot;.  I say that because microscopic examination revealed that there were no brush strokes on the image.  In fact, many including me, believe it to be a miraculous image.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to clarify that scientific analysis has demonstrated that the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe is NOT a painting if you are defining a painting as: &#8220;The representing of a subject on a surface by the application of paint or colors&#8221;.  I say that because microscopic examination revealed that there were no brush strokes on the image.  In fact, many including me, believe it to be a miraculous image.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/12 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk

Served from: u15326140.onlinehome-server.com @ 2010-03-19 05:36:46 -->