<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does the Church Teach about Oral Sex?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/</link>
	<description>an online magazine for spiritual seekers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:54:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Irving</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-6690</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Irving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-6690</guid>
		<description>It seems a little restrictive if the male, despite using medicine to overcome impotency, that a married couple&#039;s days of intimacy are over because male penetration is not possible and oral sex is the only way to achieve a climax for both of the couples. But, it appears that if the male ejaculates while trying to have sex it is all right to perform oral sex on the spouse. Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems a little restrictive if the male, despite using medicine to overcome impotency, that a married couple&#8217;s days of intimacy are over because male penetration is not possible and oral sex is the only way to achieve a climax for both of the couples. But, it appears that if the male ejaculates while trying to have sex it is all right to perform oral sex on the spouse. Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-6327</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-6327</guid>
		<description>Tom and Gerardo--

Tom the answer is no here.  There is the unitive aspect of sex that needs to be part of this as we said above: &quot;Oral sex or stimulation can never be used as a replacement for sexual intercourse.  Stimulation is another matter.

And Gerardo, we&#039;re not specifically talking about addiction here, but you make a good point, but there&#039;s lots to consider.  See our series &quot;Skin Deep&quot; at http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/skin-deep-part-1/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom and Gerardo&#8211;</p>
<p>Tom the answer is no here.  There is the unitive aspect of sex that needs to be part of this as we said above: &#8220;Oral sex or stimulation can never be used as a replacement for sexual intercourse.  Stimulation is another matter.</p>
<p>And Gerardo, we&#8217;re not specifically talking about addiction here, but you make a good point, but there&#8217;s lots to consider.  See our series &#8220;Skin Deep&#8221; at <a href="http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/skin-deep-part-1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/skin-deep-part-1/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerardo</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-6319</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-6319</guid>
		<description>Sorry. Isn&#039;t there a source where the Church says what is a sexual perversion and what isn&#039;t?. Because any perversion is bad (is demonic in its origin). I think it would be important for the Church to clearly define this. Officialy. (Sorry for not putting all my comments in one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. Isn&#8217;t there a source where the Church says what is a sexual perversion and what isn&#8217;t?. Because any perversion is bad (is demonic in its origin). I think it would be important for the Church to clearly define this. Officialy. (Sorry for not putting all my comments in one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerardo</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-6318</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-6318</guid>
		<description>I think if it is OK to perform oral sex, it should be discontinued if it is becoming a vice for anyone of the couple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if it is OK to perform oral sex, it should be discontinued if it is becoming a vice for anyone of the couple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerardo</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-6317</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-6317</guid>
		<description>What about the mental attachment that a person can have after giving oral sex. Example, become mentally obsessed with your wife genitals? (I think this should be also considered, because it can be enslaving). Also women can get obsessed with the man&#039;s genitals. There is a lot of evidence of that (sex addicts, etc.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the mental attachment that a person can have after giving oral sex. Example, become mentally obsessed with your wife genitals? (I think this should be also considered, because it can be enslaving). Also women can get obsessed with the man&#8217;s genitals. There is a lot of evidence of that (sex addicts, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-5818</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-5818</guid>
		<description>My wife is not Catholic and had her tubes tied when she was in her early twenties.  We had all the children she could comfortably raise and decided she did not want to have any more.  So, since it is impossible for her to have any more children (and is now in her 60&#039;s), does that mean that any kind of sexual climax is OK for me, including oral sex since procreation is not humanly possible in our situation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife is not Catholic and had her tubes tied when she was in her early twenties.  We had all the children she could comfortably raise and decided she did not want to have any more.  So, since it is impossible for her to have any more children (and is now in her 60&#8217;s), does that mean that any kind of sexual climax is OK for me, including oral sex since procreation is not humanly possible in our situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garth</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-4022</link>
		<dc:creator>Garth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-4022</guid>
		<description>Great article Mike. Marc to respnd to your comments. NFP is not preventing creation.  All necessary elements are present God can still act to create a human soul even when a man and woman are sure that they are not fertile at the time of intercourse. Many will attest that he He does still create even when couples are using NFP methods that are 98 - 99% effective in avoiding pregnancy. Think of it this way if God intended a woman to conceive everytime a husband and wife have sex then why didn&#039;t He make woman fertile all the time as men are? It is because He wanted husbands and wives to enjoy the unitive nature of the marital embrace even when a child is not the product. NFP allows the option to avoid pregnancy when we discern, through prayer, that having a child at that particular time would not be prudent, but is still open to creation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Mike. Marc to respnd to your comments. NFP is not preventing creation.  All necessary elements are present God can still act to create a human soul even when a man and woman are sure that they are not fertile at the time of intercourse. Many will attest that he He does still create even when couples are using NFP methods that are 98 &#8211; 99% effective in avoiding pregnancy. Think of it this way if God intended a woman to conceive everytime a husband and wife have sex then why didn&#8217;t He make woman fertile all the time as men are? It is because He wanted husbands and wives to enjoy the unitive nature of the marital embrace even when a child is not the product. NFP allows the option to avoid pregnancy when we discern, through prayer, that having a child at that particular time would not be prudent, but is still open to creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>But what is wrong with bringing your wife to orgasm if we do not have intercourse?  No fertility is lost.   Pleasure cannot in itself be evil.   This is truer when is oral sex is an expression of affection and passionate devotion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what is wrong with bringing your wife to orgasm if we do not have intercourse?  No fertility is lost.   Pleasure cannot in itself be evil.   This is truer when is oral sex is an expression of affection and passionate devotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>Very informative article, but seems to assume that procreation is always possible. What if the wife is unable to conceive or, as happens, is unable to have intercourse? Why should lovemaking that leads to ejaculation in these circumstances be sinful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative article, but seems to assume that procreation is always possible. What if the wife is unable to conceive or, as happens, is unable to have intercourse? Why should lovemaking that leads to ejaculation in these circumstances be sinful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine B. Whelan</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine B. Whelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>Excellent piece, Mike! Something that all readers of my Pure Sex, Pure Love column should consult as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent piece, Mike! Something that all readers of my Pure Sex, Pure Love column should consult as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>Yes...Nice Article Mike.  I&#039;m still not sure though why the church is so concerned with procreation.  Would it be a sin (in the eyes of the church) for a married couple to never have kids?  I think in oral sex (while neither supporting nor criticizing it), if a man climaxes outside of a woman, he neither provides opportunity for life nor kills any life.  This seems to very closely related to the church&#039;s position on condoms.  Are all married couples supposed to either have 10 kids or have sex twice in their lives?  I guess that&#039;s where NFP comes in....but even that would be an action with the intention of preventing procreation!  Let&#039;s be honest...I&#039;m confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230;Nice Article Mike.  I&#8217;m still not sure though why the church is so concerned with procreation.  Would it be a sin (in the eyes of the church) for a married couple to never have kids?  I think in oral sex (while neither supporting nor criticizing it), if a man climaxes outside of a woman, he neither provides opportunity for life nor kills any life.  This seems to very closely related to the church&#8217;s position on condoms.  Are all married couples supposed to either have 10 kids or have sex twice in their lives?  I guess that&#8217;s where NFP comes in&#8230;.but even that would be an action with the intention of preventing procreation!  Let&#8217;s be honest&#8230;I&#8217;m confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedhalo.com/features/what-does-the-church-teach-about-oral-sex/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=6529#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Nice article, very informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, very informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
