Busted Halo Subscribe: Busted Halo RSS Feed facebook You Tube iTunes
Busted Halo
feature
September 2nd, 2008
The Sarah Surprise
Why John McCain’s running mate has changed the game

While watching Barack Obama’s speech at the Democratic National Convention on Thursday night, my conservative-leaning heart sank a little. “There’s no way,” I thought, “McCain will ever out-charisma this guy. And who’s he going to pick for V.P. that would garner any real coverage or excitement? Pawlenty? Romney? Capable politicians yes, but…(yawn).”

The next day, when Senator McCain named Gov. Sarah Palin as his choice for Vice President I felt kind of giddy.

Real surprises in political campaigns are a rarity. But Sarah Palin is the unexpected plot twist in a movie where you thought you knew everything that was going to happen.

As someone who’s gotten tired of the media’s love affair with Obama (a fact that even Jon Stewart consistently mocks), I loved seeing reporters completely thrown for a loop by this choice. I also appreciated the irony in the Obama campaign’s first reaction being insult and derision. They’re all about healing the politics of division in this country, ya know.

Good Choice
Why do I think Gov. Palin is a good choice? First, she’s solidly pro-life. I’ve read some writers who say that abortion doesn’t matter in this election, but I beg to differ. It’s the first factor I look at in a candidate, and I think many Christians of all denominations feel the same way. I understand we’re not supposed to be one-issue voters, but this is still an important issue especially in light of Obama’s statement at a 2007 Planned Parenthood meeting that he would enact a federal law removing any and all restrictions on abortion when he becomes President.

Gov. Palin’s pro-life beliefs are more than a political ideal. She chose to give birth to her son despite a pre-natal diagnosis of Down Syndrome. According to a 2007 study in The New York Times, “About 90 percent of pregnant women who are given a Down syndrome diagnosis have chosen to have an abortion.” So Palin walks the walk.

And now faced with the pregnancy of her unwed 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, Sarah Palin and her whole family are sticking to their principles and supporting the teen in her decision to have her baby. The Looney Lefty blogosphere has already been tossing around vicious lies and innuendoes about the Palins, and will undoubtedly laugh at the imperfection in this Christian family—as if Christians consider themselves perfect.

“Sarah Palin is the unexpected plot twist in a movie where you thought you knew everything that was going to happen.”

On the contrary, Christians know—or at least they should know—that people are fallible. When we inevitably fail to live up to the standards we profess, we have God’s mercy, grace and forgiveness to help us move forward with courage and hope. Based on their past actions, I think the Palins will be models of that courage and hope, and help their daughter face the future with the best possible support.

Then there’s the other life issue: the War in Iraq. McCain has been accused of wanting to continue the war indefinitely. But both he and Gov. Palin have a personal investment in Iraq. Gov. Palin’s son will be deploying there in September. And Sen. McCain’s son served in Iraq recently himself, a fact the Senator never exploited for political gain. It’s illogical that these two will take the issue of war lightly.

Inexperienced but Impressive
Gov. Palin also has a history of taking on corrupt elements in her own party and sounds well-educated on energy issues. Though her experience is minimal, her accomplishments during her political career are impressive. Unintelligent, weak-willed pushovers do not take on their own party and come out the victors.

Now Gov. Palin needs to prove herself on the national stage to a hostile media and opposition. It won’t be easy. On Saturday morning, I was reminded of Hillary Clinton’s accusations of sexism against the press and Obama campaign. I wrote it off as sour grapes at the time, but now wonder if Sen. Clinton had a point. Two male reporters on a network news show snarkily commented that they can hardly wait to see the Palin-Biden Vice Presidential debate. The condescending connotation was, “I can hardly wait to see Joe Biden wipe the floor with this chick.”

Being that not a lot is known about Sarah Palin yet, it’s possible she will be a lightweight. But being that not a lot is known about Sarah Palin, she may also be smart, dynamic and articulate. Underestimate her at your own risk.

Considering how sick I was a few days ago of this already long political campaign, I’m surprised to find myself excited at seeing how things go down in the next couple of months. Gov. Sarah Palin is responsible for that excitement. Yes, there’s a chance she’ll cause the McCain campaign to crash and burn. She may also be just what he needs to turn this into a real race. Let the games begin.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (36 votes, average: 3.22 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
The Author : Tony Rossi
Tony Rossi is a writer/producer for various Catholic media and publishes the blog "The Intersection."
See more articles by Tony Rossi (16).
click "comments" above to reply
57 comments

Pages: [6] 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Zane Bradley :: November 12th, 2008 at 11:15 pm

yc0b4z4jrscx7n3u

cashelguy :: October 24th, 2008 at 2:06 am

Sarah Pakin has changed the game it is true. She is so hopelessly unequiped to President she is helpint to take the McCain candidacy into political oblivion. Not only does she not read newspapers or magazines, she doesn’t even know the names of any of them. Her son didn’t graduate from high school. Her daughter is a teen mother. She has an expense account of $150,000.00 for clothes and grooming. This is the woman who is supposedly the candidate of “family values!?”

Ken :: September 10th, 2008 at 8:49 am

How is it that I am “harping on abortions,” and not John, or Bill, or Shaun?

What does it mean that I don’t have loved ones in Afghanistan or Iraq? I don’t have loved ones in Iraq or Afghanistan–therefore my opinions don’t matter? Are you saying that the only parents who care about their children are those who have children in Iraq or Afghanistan? Are you saying that parents whose children are not in Afghanistan or Iraq have nothing to worry about? Are you saying the grief of parents who lose children in Iraq and Afghanistan is somehow more important and more worthy of concern than the grief of parents who lose children to accident or disease? Just what is your point, anyway?

I “harp on abortions” because Abortion is an issue that isn’t going to go away. I have no desire to exercise “control over women’s bodies”–everything I have been saying implies that women are perfectly capable of exercising control over their own bodies.

Catherine :: September 9th, 2008 at 9:56 am

Ken, you harp on abortions too much. There are more important issues happening today than how much control you have over womens’ bodies. Obviously you don’t have any loved ones stationed in Afghanistan or Iraq.

Ken :: September 9th, 2008 at 8:23 am

Thank you, John–point well taken, at least with regard to the US Bishops. With regard to Palin and Obama, however: I am prettier than both of them, and no one is talking about ME!

Ahem. But seriously, folks–I think Shaun is taking the discussion in the direction it needs to go. We need to think in terms of keeping abortions to an unspecified “minimum,” just as we speak in terms of keeping “collateral damage” to an unspecified minimum. If the horror of “collateral damage” is something we just have to live with in a fallen world, then abortion is, too; if an unspecified “minimum” of “collateral damage” is legal and acceptable, then an unspecified minimum of abortions must also be legal and acceptable if not morally perfect. Americans in 2008 have no business calling ourselves “pro-life.” We are not–no, not one of us.

John :: September 9th, 2008 at 1:48 am

Also…if both Palin and Obama weren’t good looking we’d not be talking about either one.

John :: September 9th, 2008 at 1:47 am

Ken–

The US Bishops have made several statements on the War in Iraq being an immoral one that does not fall under the conditions in the Just War theory.
You might not want to paint the three or four extemists bishops with the entire conference.

Pages: [6] 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

powered by the Paulists