- if Tim Kaine is pro-life, then the DNC chair is pro-life. But is he pro-life?
- How to get everybody invest in environmental action
- See? Bush isn’t so bad!
- Women in mosques
- An oversimplified but still really smart explanation of why traffic happens
- Congress more diverse than ever.
- Don’t like Updike
- Teen Pregnancy on TV
- How Wikipedia works
- Islamic Moderation
- More Blog Entries
I know, I know. He’s not full of it. Who’s full of it are people who think that because we evolved (which we obviously did), we are limited to our biology. That’s just silly. Of course, our genes might encourage certain behaviors (though this is a bit of a mystery, since it’s impossible to see a person with JUST genetic behavior and no socialized behavior). But that doesn’t mean we have to do what they ask of us, or, what’s more, that we have to think our biological instincts are morally right. Read the article here: (h/t: bookforum.)
No, the problem with the Darwinian tenor of the Menaissance is neither antipathy to women’s equality nor a misguided reading of female nature. It is an uncompromising biological determinism that makes no room for human cultivation. We are animals, the new Darwinians seem to say; get used to it. They define manhood as alpha-style toughness and unsentimental promiscuity. And in that spirit, they cultivate manipulation, calculation, and naked (in both the literal and metaphorical sense) self-interest. “Nature doesn’t care about hurting people’s feelings,” explains dating coach Mike Pilinski. “It cares ONLY about reproductive success.”
From one vantage point, they are right. Manipulation and self-interest suffused relations between the sexes even when gentlemen strode the earth; a few pages of Edith Wharton should disabuse any doubters on that score. But human beings rely on culture to tame natural selfishness. After all, we have prohibitions against grabbing a neighbor’s steak off the grill or kidnapping his daughter, to give just two examples of behavior about which Nature also doesn’t care. For this reason, successful human cultures expect far more of their men than muscle and promiscuity. If Darwinian daters fail to understand this, you can’t entirely blame them. They see that when the old dating and courting regime fell, it left a cultural vacuum with no rules for taming or shaming the boors, jerks, and assholes. What do they have to lose?






