- Hello from Syria!
- What I say to people who tell me I’m motivated by pride to question the Church
- Why I love First Things
- Catholics and Republicans on same-sex marriage and public reason
- Please don’t leave the Catholic Church!
- So, being 28…
- On Overthinking (and Susan Boyle)
- How Heresy Becomes Theology
- Why talking to certain Catholics is like talking to communists
- Changes to the Blog
- More Blog Entries
On the other hand, a majority of the victims were male and the offenders, as near as I can tell, were all male, so to ignore the possibility that a majority of the offenders were homosexual is tantamount to burying one’s head in the sand.
This statement ignores a number of issues. First because boys were available in a way girls were not, and second, from everything I have read, most pedophiles are heterosexual. The investigation of homosexuality in the seminary is offensive to me. How can a man who has struggled with his sexuality (in a society and a church that labels homosexuals as “other”) really trust that he is accepted as a child of God? This investigation places students and professors in a difficult bind. If everyone is going to be interviewed then the level of trust is damaged. Studying theology is different from other fields because it touches at the very core of who we are and what we believe. If you can’t trust the professor and your classmates then you can’t give yourself fully to your studies.
Theresa


I think this is a common misconception and one that people use as an excuse too often for excluding gays from the priesthood. Homosexuality is different from pedophaelia, and as you said most pedophiles are heterosexual.
Please note that the editorial staff reserves the right to not post comments it deems to be inappropriate and/or malicious in nature, as well as edit comments for length, clarity and fairness.